I recall that Hebraic thought embraces the irony of plurality, and here is an example from the text: “Lebanon has always exhibited unique strengths and enduring contributions that justify its survival and flourishing…Lebanon’s points of vulnerability feature the constant need to maintain demographic balances among its various sectarian components, the specter of spiking emigration when economic and security matters deteriorate sharply, and an ingrained tribal-clannish feudal-like power structure within its sect-based communities.” What Malik is getting at here is that Lebanon needs to embrace diversity. Diversity of faith groups, indigenous groups, etc. Later in the text, it is mentioned that there is a need to stop the departure of Lebanese Christians as they emigrate to other parts of the world in order for good change to happen. I agree with this deeply. The culture within the country is the key to success. I like your wording – cosmopolitan society – and I think it would benefit Lebanon greatly.
